<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fedora 11: Leonidas Roars for Attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/</link>
	<description>The Complete Magazine on Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:06:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: himadrichanda</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>himadrichanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-298</guid>
		<description>My  opinion is that Ubuntu 9.04 is better than Fedora 11. Fedora 11 is still having installation&lt;br&gt;and rebooting problem. Multimedia support is also not favorable. Debian based Ubuntu 8.04 or &lt;br&gt;9.04 gave me best result for Linux operating system either duel booting or single booting.&lt;br&gt;Internet/multimedia installations are user friendly and fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My  opinion is that Ubuntu 9.04 is better than Fedora 11. Fedora 11 is still having installation<br />and rebooting problem. Multimedia support is also not favorable. Debian based Ubuntu 8.04 or <br />9.04 gave me best result for Linux operating system either duel booting or single booting.<br />Internet/multimedia installations are user friendly and fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: himadrichanda</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>himadrichanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-278</guid>
		<description>My  opinion is that Ubuntu 9.04 is better than Fedora 11. Fedora 11 is still having installation&lt;br&gt;and rebooting problem. Multimedia support is also not favorable. Debian based Ubuntu 8.04 or &lt;br&gt;9.04 gave me best result for Linux operating system either duel booting or single booting.&lt;br&gt;Internet/multimedia installations are user friendly and fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My  opinion is that Ubuntu 9.04 is better than Fedora 11. Fedora 11 is still having installation<br />and rebooting problem. Multimedia support is also not favorable. Debian based Ubuntu 8.04 or <br />9.04 gave me best result for Linux operating system either duel booting or single booting.<br />Internet/multimedia installations are user friendly and fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay Pandey</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay Pandey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-276</guid>
		<description>I would rate fedora 11 as 1/5 on experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I use a dell d610 laptop with 2 gb of ram.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Installation and everything took a long time. I installed it on a 20 GB partition and gave a swap of 4096 MB (double of my ram).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I started it after installation, it was too slow. The experience was worse than I have on windows. I use linux because of its speed and it failed on that count.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Installation time is acceptable as that is one-off job. Slow running is not acceptable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hence the rating of 1/5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rate fedora 11 as 1/5 on experience.</p>
<p>I use a dell d610 laptop with 2 gb of ram.</p>
<p>Installation and everything took a long time. I installed it on a 20 GB partition and gave a swap of 4096 MB (double of my ram).</p>
<p>When I started it after installation, it was too slow. The experience was worse than I have on windows. I use linux because of its speed and it failed on that count.</p>
<p>Installation time is acceptable as that is one-off job. Slow running is not acceptable.</p>
<p>Hence the rating of 1/5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Garren</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Garren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-247</guid>
		<description>One thing you failed to mention, that I found highly disappointing, is not only does the Fedora 11 installer default to ext4 for the file system, but there is no option anywhere for ReiserFS - anywhere in the installer. My old /home is on ReiserFS, the one I was trying to mount in the installation, and it wouldn&#039;t even mount.&lt;br&gt;I had installed over Mandriva Cooker, just formatting / (root), and it decided to create its own /home. I tried to mount the /home I had at the time; all choices were grayed out to do so. :  So, not being able at this time to back up /home so I could choose another file system, I had to bow out of the installation.&lt;br&gt;I guess I can try Fedora 10, where there is ReiserFS support, and then upgrade to Fedora 11, but I&#039;m not so sure even that would work. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing you failed to mention, that I found highly disappointing, is not only does the Fedora 11 installer default to ext4 for the file system, but there is no option anywhere for ReiserFS &#8211; anywhere in the installer. My old /home is on ReiserFS, the one I was trying to mount in the installation, and it wouldn&#39;t even mount.<br />I had installed over Mandriva Cooker, just formatting / (root), and it decided to create its own /home. I tried to mount the /home I had at the time; all choices were grayed out to do so. :  So, not being able at this time to back up /home so I could choose another file system, I had to bow out of the installation.<br />I guess I can try Fedora 10, where there is ReiserFS support, and then upgrade to Fedora 11, but I&#39;m not so sure even that would work. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Installed today, nothing great.&lt;br&gt;Kubuntu works better!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed today, nothing great.<br />Kubuntu works better!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mvssarma</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>mvssarma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-227</guid>
		<description>after completing installation, it wanted to reboot. while re booting, it took a path to another hard disk where FC9 was present.&lt;br&gt;  the other disk was not in master, in the boot sequence.&lt;br&gt; and even if i removed the old disk, the FC11 did neither finish its jobs after first installation like setting peripherals , nor it allowed me a way to select the WinXP ( property of GRUB). after boot sequence, it used to show up a blinking horizontal cursor at the top left.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; i had to reach my PC  support person  who managed to enter some boot correction and restored my PC. while there they also tried to install the FC11 but same observation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;Sarma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after completing installation, it wanted to reboot. while re booting, it took a path to another hard disk where FC9 was present.<br />  the other disk was not in master, in the boot sequence.<br /> and even if i removed the old disk, the FC11 did neither finish its jobs after first installation like setting peripherals , nor it allowed me a way to select the WinXP ( property of GRUB). after boot sequence, it used to show up a blinking horizontal cursor at the top left.</p>
<p> i had to reach my PC  support person  who managed to enter some boot correction and restored my PC. while there they also tried to install the FC11 but same observation.</p>
<p>Regards<br />Sarma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux For You</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux For You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-226</guid>
		<description>&quot;Flawed [your] winXP&quot; as in? Do you mean it erased you XP partition or didn&#039;t list it in Grub?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The distro supplied by LFY is a the same ISO available in &lt;a href=&quot;http://fedoraproject.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fedoraproject.org&lt;/a&gt; w/ zero modifications. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Flawed [your] winXP&#8221; as in? Do you mean it erased you XP partition or didn&#39;t list it in Grub?</p>
<p>The distro supplied by LFY is a the same ISO available in <a href="http://fedoraproject.org" rel="nofollow">fedoraproject.org</a> w/ zero modifications. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mvssarma</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>mvssarma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-222</guid>
		<description>after completing installation, it wanted to reboot. while re booting, it took a path to another hard disk where FC9 was present.&lt;br&gt;  the other disk was not in master, in the boot sequence.&lt;br&gt; and even if i removed the old disk, the FC11 did neither finish its jobs after first installation like setting peripherals , nor it allowed me a way to select the WinXP ( property of GRUB). after boot sequence, it used to show up a blinking horizontal cursor at the top left.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; i had to reach my PC  support person  who managed to enter some boot correction and restored my PC. while there they also tried to install the FC11 but same observation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;Sarma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after completing installation, it wanted to reboot. while re booting, it took a path to another hard disk where FC9 was present.<br />  the other disk was not in master, in the boot sequence.<br /> and even if i removed the old disk, the FC11 did neither finish its jobs after first installation like setting peripherals , nor it allowed me a way to select the WinXP ( property of GRUB). after boot sequence, it used to show up a blinking horizontal cursor at the top left.</p>
<p> i had to reach my PC  support person  who managed to enter some boot correction and restored my PC. while there they also tried to install the FC11 but same observation.</p>
<p>Regards<br />Sarma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux For You</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux For You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-221</guid>
		<description>&quot;Flawed [your] winXP&quot; as in? Do you mean it erased you XP partition or didn&#039;t list it in Grub?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The distro supplied by LFY is a the same ISO available in &lt;a href=&quot;http://fedoraproject.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fedoraproject.org&lt;/a&gt; w/ zero modifications. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Flawed [your] winXP&#8221; as in? Do you mean it erased you XP partition or didn&#39;t list it in Grub?</p>
<p>The distro supplied by LFY is a the same ISO available in <a href="http://fedoraproject.org" rel="nofollow">fedoraproject.org</a> w/ zero modifications. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mvssarma</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>mvssarma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Fedora core11 appeared utter disappointment for me. five times, it flawed my  winxp in a dual boot installation. EarlierI could install  FC9 much easily and there were no issues.  finally i had to go to the PC repair shop to get my winXP restored.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I fear whether there were some issues with the distro supplied by LFY and whether they would chack it up and plan to supply a replacement instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fedora core11 appeared utter disappointment for me. five times, it flawed my  winxp in a dual boot installation. EarlierI could install  FC9 much easily and there were no issues.  finally i had to go to the PC repair shop to get my winXP restored.</p>
<p>I fear whether there were some issues with the distro supplied by LFY and whether they would chack it up and plan to supply a replacement instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fedora 11: Leonidas Roars for Attention – LINUX For You Magazine &#124; TuxWire : The Linux Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Fedora 11: Leonidas Roars for Attention – LINUX For You Magazine &#124; TuxWire : The Linux Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-211</guid>
		<description>[...] Excerpt from: Fedora 11: Leonidas Roars for Attention – LINUX For You Magazine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpt from: Fedora 11: Leonidas Roars for Attention – LINUX For You Magazine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Battle of Gagra &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fedora 11 codenamed Leonidas, will kick bad guys into pit</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Battle of Gagra &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fedora 11 codenamed Leonidas, will kick bad guys into pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-210</guid>
		<description>[...] Fedora 11: Leonidas Roars for Attention – LINUX For You Magazine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fedora 11: Leonidas Roars for Attention – LINUX For You Magazine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atanu Datta</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Atanu Datta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-197</guid>
		<description>I guess I goofed up while delving over an apt headline. Anyway, have corrected the codename in the this version, but letting the headline be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I goofed up while delving over an apt headline. Anyway, have corrected the codename in the this version, but letting the headline be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sankarshan</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>sankarshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-195</guid>
		<description>It should be Leonidas - that&#039;s the release name.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- sankarshan at fedoraproject dot org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be Leonidas &#8211; that&#39;s the release name.</p>
<p>- sankarshan at fedoraproject dot org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashpant</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxforu.com/reviews/fedora11-review/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashpant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxforu.com/?p=1460#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Looks nice.. I won&#039;t be reading it now :P Will read it from the magazine itself. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I heard Leonidas was another failure .. I would give it a try just for Plymouth, though I am sure it won&#039;t as ATI open source driver has just merged KMS in kernel 2.6.31 which is not likely to be included in F11..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Judging by the rating it ok .. Nothing fancy to be used.. the only led down is the repositories, even with rpmfusion I don&#039;t find as many software as Mandriva, Ubuntu and Arch Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice.. I won&#39;t be reading it now :P Will read it from the magazine itself. </p>
<p>I heard Leonidas was another failure .. I would give it a try just for Plymouth, though I am sure it won&#39;t as ATI open source driver has just merged KMS in kernel 2.6.31 which is not likely to be included in F11..</p>
<p>Judging by the rating it ok .. Nothing fancy to be used.. the only led down is the repositories, even with rpmfusion I don&#39;t find as many software as Mandriva, Ubuntu and Arch Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
